Using RepeatMasker with a library generated by RepeatModeler, PLEs are missing from final RepeatMasker quantifications. In the consensus library, RepeatClassifier classifies these elements as family#PLE/subclass. I think this is due to RepBase PLEs having the headers as family#LINE/Penelope, so the inconsistency leads to PLEs not being quantified in the final summaries.
Reproduction steps
RepeatMasker with a library from RepeatModeler in which PLEs are named by RepeatClassifier as: family#PLE/subclass. (E.G family#PLE/Chlamys
Which version of RepeatMasker do you have?
4.1.4
Have you installed RepBase RepeatMasker Edition, or the full Dfam database?
Using RepeatMasker with a library generated by RepeatModeler, PLEs are missing from final RepeatMasker quantifications. In the consensus library, RepeatClassifier classifies these elements as family#PLE/subclass. I think this is due to RepBase PLEs having the headers as family#LINE/Penelope, so the inconsistency leads to PLEs not being quantified in the final summaries.
Reproduction steps
RepeatMasker with a library from RepeatModeler in which PLEs are named by RepeatClassifier as: family#PLE/subclass. (E.G family#PLE/Chlamys
4.1.4
Full Dfam 3.7
Ubuntu LTS 22.04