Dhondtguido / CalculiX

This repository contains the source files of CalculiX, a three-dimensional Finite Element Program (www.calculix.de).
GNU General Public License v2.0
72 stars 16 forks source link

possible bugs in *Equation and remove (Beam element) #66

Closed xyont closed 8 months ago

xyont commented 8 months ago

hi,

reading of documentation, there’s an option to remove in specific nodes by Equation. However, the behavior of the solver shown unexpected, it seems nodes and dof’s been defined are in expanded ones. This problem does not occur when node is separated and connecting by Equation.

is this problem such as bug or currently limitation? hopefully, fix or improvement is available in the next or future versions of CalculiX.

regards,

2023-12-07 19_36_26-errB32Rbalok inp - SciTE

**
** Structure: beam fixed both end, two element, hinged at spans
** Test objective: B32R elements.
**         possible bugs in *Rquation and remove
**
*NODE,NSET=Nall
1, 0, 0, 0
2, 0, 0, 25
3, 0, 0, 50
4, 0, 0, 75
5, 0, 0, 100
*ELEMENT,TYPE=B32R,ELSET=EAll
1,1,2,3
2,3,4,5
*BOUNDARY
1,1,6
5,1,6
*MATERIAL,NAME=ALUM
*ELASTIC
1E7,.3
*DENSITY
2.7E-9
*BEAM SECTION,ELSET=EAll,MATERIAL=ALUM,SECTION=RECT
5.,10.
1.d0,0.d0,0.d0
*Equation, Remove
3,4,6
*STEP
*STATIC,SOLVER=SPOOLES
*DLOAD
Eall,GRAV,9810.,0.,-1.,0.
*El File,Output=3D
S,E
*Node File
U
*End Step
xyont commented 8 months ago

i miss to interpreted above sentences. It’s a specific to Remove All options. This is not a bug or limitation, and removing some dof’s at specific node in continuous mesh is not possible. Only can do by separated nodes and connecting with MPC