Closed garryod closed 2 weeks ago
Looking at this now...
I agree that spec.type=documentation
is erroneous, but I'm inclined to say that spec.lifecycle=experimental
is a reasonable default value for new projects. Of the list you linked, I would consider almost all of the components that come from this template to be experimental, some may be arguably alpha. I may have misunderstood the classification though, open to other views.
I agree most projects will start as experimental, but if it is a copier question then people will (might) read it when they update to the latest version and consider changing it.
There are currently 32 components erroneously marked with
spec.type=documentation
andspec.lifecycle=experimental
in the developer portal, the vast majority of which originated from this template. Please could you update the template such that these fields must be specified. Additionally, it would be good to removesscc
as the default forowner
as it has been used in 22 of the 32 aforementioned repos