Closed AlexanderWells-diamond closed 10 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
f2330b6
) 87.73% compared to head (dd63ac8
) 87.43%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
15 files ±0 15 suites ±0 28m 20s :stopwatch: -8s 278 tests ±0 262 :heavy_check_mark: ±0 16 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0 4 170 runs ±0 3 575 :heavy_check_mark: ±0 595 :zzz: ±0 0 :x: ±0
Results for commit dd63ac83. ± Comparison against base commit f2330b64.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
@mdavidsaver is this the correct fix?
This version changed the name of its inbuilt .dbd files
This was not intentional (mdavidsaver/pvxs#65). fyi. renaming/removal of a .dbd file is to my mind an incompatible API change, which would trigger a major version increment.
Fixed in pvxslibs==1.3.1. I have "yanked" 1.3.0 on pypi.org.
It would help in detecting issues like this if pythonSoftIOC could add a CI job testing the current 'master' branches of epicscorelibs, pvxs, and p4p.
PR is no longer necessary.
This version changed the name of its inbuilt .dbd files, which we must match in order to load it
Also updated various other dependencies in order to make the pipenv environment stable
Closes #145