Output treatment for factorial designs

[Prof-ThiagoOliveira]

Dear authors,

Please, include a new argument like the factorLabels I have suggested here (DidierMurilloF/FielDHub#7). This argument can help end-users to understand the treatment output better.

A suggestion of alternative expected output:

• [x] Function full_factorial() - Done!

   ID LOCATION PLOT REP FACTOR_A FACTOR_B FACTOR_C   TRT_COMB
  1     1   Loc1    101   1       a0       b0       c1   a0*b0*c1
  2     2   Loc1    102   1       a1       b0       c1   a1*b0*c1
  3     3   Loc1    103   1       a1       b1       c0   a1*b1*c0

• [x] Function split_plot():

   ID LOCATION    PLOT    REP   WHOLE-PLOT    SUB-PLOT     TRT_COMB
  1     1    A        101      1       Fung4       Beans5     Fung4|Beans5
  2     2    A        101      1       Fung4       Beans1     Fung4|Beans1
  3     3    A        101      1       Fung4       Beans2     Fung4|Beans2

• [x] Function split_split_plot():

  ID LOCATION PLOT REP WHOLE-PLOT SUB-PLOT SUB-SUB-PLOT TRT_COMB
  1   1        A  101   1     IRR_NO    Fung3       Beans3    IRR_NO|Fung3|Beans3
  2   2        A  101   1     IRR_NO    Fung3       Beans9    IRR_NO|Fung3|Beans9
  3   3        A  101   1     IRR_NO    Fung3      Beans10    IRR_NO|Fung3|Beans10

• [x] Function strip_plot () - Done!

[DidierMurilloF]

Dear Thiago,

We included the factorLabels argument into split_plot(), split_split_plot() and strip_plot () functions. Please, let us know if you have any question. Thank you!

Best,

Didier Murillo