Open SuperBruceJia opened 3 years ago
The memory usage is just too high to use batch training. The input with shape batch_size × node × in_features
would be expanded to shape batch_size × node × node × 2 out_features
during training. I'm trying to reduce the memory usage.
The memory usage is just too high to use batch training. The input with shape
batch_size × node × in_features
would be expanded to shapebatch_size × node × node × 2 out_features
during training. I'm trying to reduce the memory usage.
I'm really looking forward to your solution to memory usage
!
Thanks in advance.
Best,
Shuyue
The memory usage is just too high to use batch training. The input with shape
batch_size × node × in_features
would be expanded to shapebatch_size × node × node × 2 out_features
during training. I'm trying to reduce the memory usage.
I also met critical memory usage problems while implementing on a large-number nodes dataset, e.g., 5000 - 10000 nodes. I really hope you can solve the memory problem bro.
Looking forward to seeing your progress bro.
Best regards,
Shuyue
@Diego999 @HowardZorn @pbloem @sh0416
Looking forward to seeing your progress bro.
Hello, Shuyue
My solution is under review now. You can see it at Pull Requests
#63, or visit my branch: HowardZorn/pyGAT.
Cheers, Howard
Actually, implementing batch training is not a hard work if memory is sufficient during training. Here is an example: https://blog.csdn.net/pixian3729/article/details/110261140 (In Simplified Chinese). Good luck!
Looking forward to seeing your progress bro.
Hello, Shuyue
My solution is under review now. You can see it at
Pull Requests
#63, or visit my branch: HowardZorn/pyGAT.Cheers, Howard
Dear Howard,
Thanks a lot for your help! You are an extraordinary man! I really appreciate it.
Another thing to inquire about is the multi-GPU training
, when I try to use two GPUs, an error about the model and data parallel occurred.
For details:
File "/home/jsy/.conda/envs/torch/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/nn/modules/module.py", line 727, in _call_impl
result = self.forward(*input, **kwargs)
File "/home/jsy/.conda/envs/torch/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/nn/parallel/data_parallel.py", line 161, in forward
outputs = self.parallel_apply(replicas, inputs, kwargs)
File "/home/jsy/.conda/envs/torch/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/nn/parallel/data_parallel.py", line 171, in parallel_apply
return parallel_apply(replicas, inputs, kwargs, self.device_ids[:len(replicas)])
File "/home/jsy/.conda/envs/torch/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/nn/parallel/parallel_apply.py", line 86, in parallel_apply
output.reraise()
File "/home/jsy/.conda/envs/torch/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/_utils.py", line 428, in reraise
raise self.exc_type(msg)
RuntimeError: Caught RuntimeError in replica 0 on device 0.
Original Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/jsy/.conda/envs/torch/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/nn/parallel/parallel_apply.py", line 61, in _worker
output = module(*input, **kwargs)
File "/home/jsy/.conda/envs/torch/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/nn/modules/module.py", line 727, in _call_impl
result = self.forward(*input, **kwargs)
File "/home/jsy/gnn/gnn.py", line 32, in forward
x = torch.cat([att(x, adj) for att in self.attentions], dim=1)
File "/home/jsy/gnn/gnn.py", line 32, in <listcomp>
x = torch.cat([att(x, adj) for att in self.attentions], dim=1)
File "/home/jsy/.conda/envs/torch/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/nn/modules/module.py", line 727, in _call_impl
result = self.forward(*input, **kwargs)
File "/home/jsy/gnn/layers.py", line 32, in forward
attention = torch.where(adj > 0, e, zero_vec)
RuntimeError: The size of tensor a (3000) must match the size of tensor b (1500) at non-singleton dimension 1
Thanks in advance and I'm looking forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Shuyue
@HowardZorn @Diego999
Another thing to inquire about is the
multi-GPU training
, when I try to use two GPUs, an error about the model and data parallel occurred.
Shuyue, happy to see your reply. Multi-GPU training must implement batch training. My solution is just for memory issues. Could you show your code for batch training?
Another thing to inquire about is the
multi-GPU training
, when I try to use two GPUs, an error about the model and data parallel occurred.Shuyue, happy to see your reply. Multi-GPU training must implement batch training. My solution is just for memory issues. Could you show your code for batch training?
Dear Howard,
Thanks a lot for your quick reply.
As for the batch training, please refer to this issue https://github.com/Diego999/pyGAT/issues/36.
Best,
Shuyue
@HowardZorn
Another thing to inquire about is the
multi-GPU training
, when I try to use two GPUs, an error about the model and data parallel occurred.Shuyue, happy to see your reply. Multi-GPU training must implement batch training. My solution is just for memory issues. Could you show your code for batch training?
Dear Howard,
If you don't mind, you can upload and pull the batch training with less memory usage codes.
Thanks in advance.
Best,
Shuyue
@HowardZorn
Another thing to inquire about is the
multi-GPU training
, when I try to use two GPUs, an error about the model and data parallel occurred.Shuyue, happy to see your reply. Multi-GPU training must implement batch training. My solution is just for memory issues. Could you show your code for batch training?
Dear Howard,
Thanks a lot for your help.
I edited the batch training codes:
At the layers.py
file:
class GraphAttentionLayer(nn.Module):
"""
https://github.com/Diego999/pyGAT/blob/master/layers.py
Simple GAT layer, similar to https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10903
"""
def __init__(self, in_features, out_features, dropout, alpha, concat=True):
super(GraphAttentionLayer, self).__init__()
self.dropout = dropout
self.in_features = in_features
self.out_features = out_features
self.alpha = alpha
self.concat = concat
self.W = nn.Parameter(torch.empty(size=(in_features, out_features)))
nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.W.data, gain=1.414)
self.a = nn.Parameter(torch.empty(size=(2 * out_features, 1)))
nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.a.data, gain=1.414)
self.leakyrelu = nn.LeakyReLU(self.alpha)
def forward(self, h, adj):
"""
:param h: (batch_zize, number_nodes, in_features)
:param adj: (batch_size, number_nodes, number_nodes)
:return: (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features)
"""
# batchwise matrix multiplication
Wh = torch.matmul(h, self.W) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, in_features) * (in_features, out_features) -> (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features)
e = self.prepare_batch(Wh) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes)
# (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes)
zero_vec = -9e15 * torch.ones_like(e)
# (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes)
attention = torch.where(adj > 0, e, zero_vec)
# (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes)
attention = F.softmax(attention, dim=-1)
# (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes)
attention = F.dropout(attention, self.dropout, training=self.training)
# batched matrix multiplication (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features)
h_prime = torch.matmul(attention, Wh)
if self.concat:
return F.elu(h_prime)
else:
return h_prime
def prepare_batch(self, Wh):
"""
with batch training
:param Wh: (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features)
:return:
"""
# Wh.shape (B, N, out_feature)
# self.a.shape (2 * out_feature, 1)
# Wh1&2.shape (B, N, 1)
# e.shape (B, N, N)
B, N, E = Wh.shape # (B, N, N)
# (B, N, out_feature) X (out_feature, 1) -> (B, N, 1)
Wh1 = torch.matmul(Wh, self.a[:self.out_features, :]) # (B, N, out_feature) X (out_feature, 1) -> (B, N, 1)
Wh2 = torch.matmul(Wh, self.a[self.out_features:, :]) # (B, N, out_feature) X (out_feature, 1) -> (B, N, 1)
# broadcast add (B, N, 1) + (B, 1, N)
e = Wh1 + Wh2.permute(0, 2, 1) # (B, N, N)
return self.leakyrelu(e)
def __repr__(self):
return self.__class__.__name__ + ' (' + str(self.in_features) + ' -> ' + str(self.out_features) + ')'
At the same time,
at the models.py
file:
We should change line 21: x = torch.cat([att(x, adj) for att in self.attentions], dim=1)
to
x = torch.cat([att(x, adj) for att in self.attentions], dim=-1)
Meanwhile, can you help me review and check the codes to make sure they worked correctly, I mean, mathematically?
Thanks in advance and have a nice day!
Best,
Shuyue
@HowardZorn
Another thing to inquire about is the
multi-GPU training
, when I try to use two GPUs, an error about the model and data parallel occurred.Shuyue, happy to see your reply. Multi-GPU training must implement batch training. My solution is just for memory issues. Could you show your code for batch training?
Dear Howard,
I also found that the memory usage surged while training with batches. The memory issue of this model really bothers me. Do you have any ideas to further decrease memory usage and speed up the training process?
I'm looking forward to your reply.
Best,
Shuyue
@HowardZorn
@Diego999
Dear Shuyue,
I'm glad to see your reply.
Meanwhile, can you help me review and check the codes to make sure they worked correctly, I mean, mathematically?
Your implementation is consistent with the algorithm in the original paper, and so am I. I don't think there is anything wrong.
I also found that the memory usage surged while training with batches. The memory issue of this model really bothers me. Do you have any ideas to further decrease memory usage and speed up the training process?
I also suffered from this. Finally, I lowered the hyperparameters to avoid OOM errors. I will continue to find some ways to reduce memory usage from the algorithm.
Cheers, Howard
Dear Shuyue,
I'm glad to see your reply.
Meanwhile, can you help me review and check the codes to make sure they worked correctly, I mean, mathematically?
Your implementation is consistent with the algorithm in the original paper, and so am I. I don't think there is anything wrong.
I also found that the memory usage surged while training with batches. The memory issue of this model really bothers me. Do you have any ideas to further decrease memory usage and speed up the training process?
I also suffered from this. Finally, I lowered the hyperparameters to avoid OOM errors. I will continue to find some ways to reduce memory usage from the algorithm.
Cheers, Howard
Great!
Let me try to figure out how to implement on multi GPUs to distribute memories to multiple devices.
Thanks again for your help and guide.
Have a nice day!
Best,
Shuyue
Dear Shuyue,
I'm glad to see your reply.
Meanwhile, can you help me review and check the codes to make sure they worked correctly, I mean, mathematically?
Your implementation is consistent with the algorithm in the original paper, and so am I. I don't think there is anything wrong.
I also found that the memory usage surged while training with batches. The memory issue of this model really bothers me. Do you have any ideas to further decrease memory usage and speed up the training process?
I also suffered from this. Finally, I lowered the hyperparameters to avoid OOM errors. I will continue to find some ways to reduce memory usage from the algorithm.
Cheers, Howard
Any idea on this issue? https://github.com/Diego999/pyGAT/issues/64
Another thing to inquire about is the
multi-GPU training
, when I try to use two GPUs, an error about the model and data parallel occurred.Shuyue, happy to see your reply. Multi-GPU training must implement batch training. My solution is just for memory issues. Could you show your code for batch training?
Dear Howard,
Thanks a lot for your help.
I edited the batch training codes:
At the
layers.py
file:class GraphAttentionLayer(nn.Module): """ https://github.com/Diego999/pyGAT/blob/master/layers.py Simple GAT layer, similar to https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10903 """ def __init__(self, in_features, out_features, dropout, alpha, concat=True): super(GraphAttentionLayer, self).__init__() self.dropout = dropout self.in_features = in_features self.out_features = out_features self.alpha = alpha self.concat = concat self.W = nn.Parameter(torch.empty(size=(in_features, out_features))) nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.W.data, gain=1.414) self.a = nn.Parameter(torch.empty(size=(2 * out_features, 1))) nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.a.data, gain=1.414) self.leakyrelu = nn.LeakyReLU(self.alpha) def forward(self, h, adj): """ :param h: (batch_zize, number_nodes, in_features) :param adj: (batch_size, number_nodes, number_nodes) :return: (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features) """ # batchwise matrix multiplication Wh = torch.matmul(h, self.W) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, in_features) * (in_features, out_features) -> (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features) e = self.prepare_batch(Wh) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes) zero_vec = -9e15 * torch.ones_like(e) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes) attention = torch.where(adj > 0, e, zero_vec) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes) attention = F.softmax(attention, dim=-1) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes) attention = F.dropout(attention, self.dropout, training=self.training) # batched matrix multiplication (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features) h_prime = torch.matmul(attention, Wh) if self.concat: return F.elu(h_prime) else: return h_prime def prepare_batch(self, Wh): """ with batch training :param Wh: (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features) :return: """ # Wh.shape (B, N, out_feature) # self.a.shape (2 * out_feature, 1) # Wh1&2.shape (B, N, 1) # e.shape (B, N, N) B, N, E = Wh.shape # (B, N, N) # (B, N, out_feature) X (out_feature, 1) -> (B, N, 1) Wh1 = torch.matmul(Wh, self.a[:self.out_features, :]) # (B, N, out_feature) X (out_feature, 1) -> (B, N, 1) Wh2 = torch.matmul(Wh, self.a[self.out_features:, :]) # (B, N, out_feature) X (out_feature, 1) -> (B, N, 1) # broadcast add (B, N, 1) + (B, 1, N) e = Wh1 + Wh2.permute(0, 2, 1) # (B, N, N) return self.leakyrelu(e) def __repr__(self): return self.__class__.__name__ + ' (' + str(self.in_features) + ' -> ' + str(self.out_features) + ')'
At the same time, at the
models.py
file:We should change line 21:
x = torch.cat([att(x, adj) for att in self.attentions], dim=1)
tox = torch.cat([att(x, adj) for att in self.attentions], dim=-1)
Meanwhile, can you help me review and check the codes to make sure they worked correctly, I mean, mathematically?
Thanks in advance and have a nice day!
Best,
Shuyue
@HowardZorn
Thank you very much for your sharing
I have also been doing batch training recently
Can you share your code?
Another thing to inquire about is the
multi-GPU training
, when I try to use two GPUs, an error about the model and data parallel occurred.Shuyue, happy to see your reply. Multi-GPU training must implement batch training. My solution is just for memory issues. Could you show your code for batch training?
Dear Howard, Thanks a lot for your help. I edited the batch training codes: At the
layers.py
file:class GraphAttentionLayer(nn.Module): """ https://github.com/Diego999/pyGAT/blob/master/layers.py Simple GAT layer, similar to https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10903 """ def __init__(self, in_features, out_features, dropout, alpha, concat=True): super(GraphAttentionLayer, self).__init__() self.dropout = dropout self.in_features = in_features self.out_features = out_features self.alpha = alpha self.concat = concat self.W = nn.Parameter(torch.empty(size=(in_features, out_features))) nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.W.data, gain=1.414) self.a = nn.Parameter(torch.empty(size=(2 * out_features, 1))) nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.a.data, gain=1.414) self.leakyrelu = nn.LeakyReLU(self.alpha) def forward(self, h, adj): """ :param h: (batch_zize, number_nodes, in_features) :param adj: (batch_size, number_nodes, number_nodes) :return: (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features) """ # batchwise matrix multiplication Wh = torch.matmul(h, self.W) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, in_features) * (in_features, out_features) -> (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features) e = self.prepare_batch(Wh) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes) zero_vec = -9e15 * torch.ones_like(e) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes) attention = torch.where(adj > 0, e, zero_vec) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes) attention = F.softmax(attention, dim=-1) # (batch_zize, number_nodes, number_nodes) attention = F.dropout(attention, self.dropout, training=self.training) # batched matrix multiplication (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features) h_prime = torch.matmul(attention, Wh) if self.concat: return F.elu(h_prime) else: return h_prime def prepare_batch(self, Wh): """ with batch training :param Wh: (batch_zize, number_nodes, out_features) :return: """ # Wh.shape (B, N, out_feature) # self.a.shape (2 * out_feature, 1) # Wh1&2.shape (B, N, 1) # e.shape (B, N, N) B, N, E = Wh.shape # (B, N, N) # (B, N, out_feature) X (out_feature, 1) -> (B, N, 1) Wh1 = torch.matmul(Wh, self.a[:self.out_features, :]) # (B, N, out_feature) X (out_feature, 1) -> (B, N, 1) Wh2 = torch.matmul(Wh, self.a[self.out_features:, :]) # (B, N, out_feature) X (out_feature, 1) -> (B, N, 1) # broadcast add (B, N, 1) + (B, 1, N) e = Wh1 + Wh2.permute(0, 2, 1) # (B, N, N) return self.leakyrelu(e) def __repr__(self): return self.__class__.__name__ + ' (' + str(self.in_features) + ' -> ' + str(self.out_features) + ')'
At the same time, at the
models.py
file: We should change line 21:x = torch.cat([att(x, adj) for att in self.attentions], dim=1)
tox = torch.cat([att(x, adj) for att in self.attentions], dim=-1)
Meanwhile, can you help me review and check the codes to make sure they worked correctly, I mean, mathematically? Thanks in advance and have a nice day! Best, Shuyue @HowardZorn
Thank you very much for your sharing
I have also been doing batch training recently
Can you share your code?
Hi,
Thanks for your interest!
I'm currently working on cross-subject research rather than GNN. As a result, the codes didn't fit the GNN datasets, e.g., the Cora dataset.
However, after I finished the project, if there are superior performances, I'll open-source the codes. I'll let you know later.
Best regards,
Shuyue
I also found that the memory usage surged while training with batches. The memory issue of this model really bothers me. Do you have any ideas to further decrease memory usage and speed up the training process?
I found that the multi-head attention implementation of pyGAT could be improved.
I also found that the memory usage surged while training with batches. The memory issue of this model really bothers me. Do you have any ideas to further decrease memory usage and speed up the training process?
I found that the multi-head attention implementation of pyGAT could be improved.
Dear Howard,
Could your share your codes or ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Best,
Shuyue
@HowardZorn
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your great work! I really appreciate it!
Is there any way to implement batch training?
Thanks in advance.
Best,
Shuyue