Added xml:lang= to the 'q' element.
I compared the new RNG file to the old, enough to convince myself there were no major side-effects. I did not, however, try validating all the articles again.
So my instinct is that if we do want to allow <q> with @xml:lang, this is probably good to go. If not, it should be rejected.
Note that it looks to me like common/xslt/dhq2html.xsl will process <q> with @xml:lang properly already — no change required.
Added xml:lang= to the 'q' element. I compared the new RNG file to the old, enough to convince myself there were no major side-effects. I did not, however, try validating all the articles again.
So my instinct is that if we do want to allow
<q>
with@xml:lang
, this is probably good to go. If not, it should be rejected.Note that it looks to me like common/xslt/dhq2html.xsl will process
<q>
with@xml:lang
properly already — no change required.