On the withdrawal / issue form, if an item is stocked in multiple places, it appears multiple times in the Item dropdown.
For each of these, only one location will be available in the second dropdown. Presumably the intention of the double dropdowns is to group some of the 'item-location stockpiles' by either parameter, but it's not working. Also the location can't be selected before the item is. If I were a user with 100 unique items across 10 locations, as I do a withdrawal I would rather select the location first, thus I have to choose 1 of 10 then 1 of 10, rather than struggle to find my item in a monolithic list of 100. The same happens in the Order form.
Also the 'middle' fields can't be edited, they are auto populated from the drop downs selected. The Withdrawn by can be edited (and is required - oh wait an empty string is accepted, validation required?) - could this be formatted differently in some way to add distinction?
On the withdrawal / issue form, if an item is stocked in multiple places, it appears multiple times in the Item dropdown. For each of these, only one location will be available in the second dropdown. Presumably the intention of the double dropdowns is to group some of the 'item-location stockpiles' by either parameter, but it's not working. Also the location can't be selected before the item is. If I were a user with 100 unique items across 10 locations, as I do a withdrawal I would rather select the location first, thus I have to choose 1 of 10 then 1 of 10, rather than struggle to find my item in a monolithic list of 100. The same happens in the Order form.
Also the 'middle' fields can't be edited, they are auto populated from the drop downs selected. The Withdrawn by can be edited (and is required - oh wait an empty string is accepted, validation required?) - could this be formatted differently in some way to add distinction?