Open tobyaharris opened 3 weeks ago
@Greg-Hawkridge what did you conclude the plan of action was to be with this one? How easy will it be to show 0s? I can't see how to do this.
Showing 0s won't be easy. Current ordering is latest change at the time of page refresh.
While testing feature/sort-item
I found that actually bulk types with 0 quantity are shown.
In the below dashboard I moved 10 of MyDynamicBulk
from New
to MyLocation1
, then I moved the same 10 from MyLocation1
to Complete
. MyDynamicBulk
still appears in the MyLocation1
column with a timestamp instead of a quantity. For current customers that might be convenient, but do we want to keep this long term?
PS I included Dynamic
in each item name to hint that they were created with the # or % operators, rather than predefined in :8002
Reproduced the above on a new build but this time by predefining the ID Entry. I had just transferred all the items out of MyLoc. The dashboard quantities update quickly, but the items list entries do not: Once the page is refreshed, the zero entries dissapear: As we don't expect users to be manually refreshing the page - could we turn this into a feature, using the autorefresh config as an alias for 'show zero quantities'?
As per last couple of comments above, I think there is more to this than 14 resolved.
A QoL feature requested by a customer -
In use cases where the number of unique items is small, but the number of locations is larger, it can feel fustrating when the items are listed in a different order in each location in the dashboard. This requires the user to read carefully and slows down making comparisons.
Currently I suspect the rows (items) in each column (location) are ordered by quantity there, most at the top. Alternatively they may be sorted by last transaction time. More testing needed to confirm the status quo.
Could these be sorted alphbetically instead? If there are cases where alphabetically is not the best, could the sort order be configurable? Drop-down on the dashboard to select sort order?
By extension of this, what about a dedicated row per item (i.e. sort alphabetically with zero quantities also shown)?
I might be proposing 4 sort orders: