Closed caspervdw closed 3 years ago
projections (plural) would be more in line with the rest of the API. The name will definitely be more clearer then.
I agree that projections is a much clearer name than Crss.
It would be better if the naming in the response and the query are consistent.
(During team discussion) Rename outputCrs to projection, both for query parameter in .../data and for /outputCrss end point
Currently, the projection of the domainSet of a coverage is still named _srsName (spatial reference system name). Should we rename this attribute to projection, to be consistent with the /projections end point and the projection query parameter?
I prefer consistency and I think that projection is more clear than srsName.
I find the shorthand
Crs
in the endpoint and queryparameters a bit awkward. I'd rather rename it to the more readableprojection
throughout.Also in the response, we use
srsName
.