Closed jkahn closed 8 years ago
Whoops, I see that bug #1 might have already covered this.
.... uh, no there's still plenty of work to do in matching the expected packaging.python.org format. Distribution to PyPI, pip install behavior, etc etc.
First of all, thank you for checking this. I'm afraid I only worried about pip in issue #1. Sorry, this was all new for me.
Checking https://packaging.python.org/distributing/ I have:
I think the structure is reasonably good now, but I would like to hear an expert opinion before closing the issue.
I think the structure is now good enough according to these rules -at least to my rookie eye-, so I consider the issue closed. If you find anything that can be improved, please do not hesitate to open a new one.
Here from the JOSS review thread:
This project is not organized in the canonical ways a distributable piece of code should be in the standard Python universe. I recommend reviewing https://packaging.python.org/ and adding a setup.py. Consider distributing commandline behaviors as
entry_points
console scripts. Organizing and distributing your code in standard ways makes it more likely that other OSS users can take advantage of your brilliance.