Expos/DR should have default mode order and support negative weights

[GoogleCodeExporter]

As also listed for companion9x, although likely really an open9x issue.

- The order of Rud/Ele/Thr/Ail within Expos/DR should likely corresponded to 
the order defined in general settings, which I presume it should as it says 
"Channel Order (for Templates)". If I set my default to mode 2 (RTEA), the 
order as they appear in for Expos/DR is not effected, it would be nice if they 
reflected the default selected order.

- lastly, it would be nice if Expos/DR also supported negative weights as can 
be specified for mixes, and thereby instead of having to define a negative 
curves, the control may simply be given a negative weight,
(I thought this worked before, but I must have been wrong.)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by sch...@comcast.net on 26 May 2012 at 3:41

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I answer also here:
expos/dr are applied to inputs (sticks) not to outputs, so the order the dialog 
is the internal order of sticks and is not affected by channel order.
About weight: a negative value there is meaningless if you think in the logic 
of inputs: it's a travel limiter not a travel inversion, it's better to do it 
in the mixer. Otherwise there will be 5 possible ways to invert a channel...
It doesn't make sense...
For expo instead a negative value is allowed as it increases sensibility in the 
center of the stick

Original comment by romolo.m...@gmail.com on 26 May 2012 at 7:39

• Changed state: WontFix

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Actually it makes more sense to conditionally invert/scale the effect of an 
input here if used within multiple mixes, doesn't it?

As otherwise why not eliminate the Expos/DR window, as each use of its inputs 
may be conditionally inverted and/or linearly and/or exponentially scaled 
within a channel mix specification? (Which I'm not against, as the only value 
the Expos/Dr settings have is that it allows the conditional scaling of inputs 
which may be used in multiple mixes, and thereby not needing to change multiple 
mixes if wanting to scale any a common input.)

Your thoughts?

Original comment by sch...@comcast.net on 26 May 2012 at 9:43