Open DingBao-sys opened 7 months ago
We thank you for your feedback and will take it into consideration for any future extensions.
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Use Case Inconsistent with what is actually going on
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
I think for 3a what happens is that the use case ends, nothing gets deleted however he shows that the use case step resumes in step 2 when in fact it resumes at step 2 or the receptionist gives up.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S2/pe-interim#2551] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
We gladly accept the bug, thank you.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: after my own pe responding session, I know me doing this can be frustrating to you guys, I am sincerely sorry, however, I do not think I can accept this, because the current issue is - insufficient use cases but the issue it is considered duplicated off focus on - incorrect use case, so I think they are pretty different cases.
The app provided numerous commands such as edit delete-v etc
however, the DG only listed 5 use cases neglecting important use cases such as edit and all its variations
and I feel we should have a use case at least for each unique command like edit addVisit etc