run_analysis() returns unclear output

[fsdias]

I'm working with a project that I can send you privately

I run this: project1<-"/path/to_folder" converted <- convert_project(project1)

and it worked as expected. Then I looked into "converted" to see what was inside:

converted ID Name 1 3 80+10c 2 4 75+9 3 5 70+8 4 6 Defaults 5 7 72+9 6 9 Uni+poly+70 7 10 Uni+coos+72 8 11 Uni+cos+70 9 12 Hn+cos+72 10 13 Hn+cos+70 11 14 Uni+poly+72 12 15 Hr+cos+70 13 16 Hn+Hpoly+72 14 17 Hn+Hpoly+70 15 18 Hr+poly+70 16 19 Hr+cos+72 17 20 Hr+poly+72 18 21 Defaults no truncation

It's unclear what "80+10c" (line 1) means. To find out I did:

analysis_1 <- run_analysis(converted[[1]], debug=TRUE)

analysis_1

Model name: 80+10c Call: mrds::ddf(dsmodel=~cds(key="hn",formula=~1,adj.series="cos",adj.order=NULL),meta.data=list(width=101,left=0),control=list(mono=TRUE, mono.strict=TRUE),method="ds",data=obs_table)

It turns out it's a Half-normal with cos adjustments. This is weird since lines 9 and 10 report half-normal with cos adjustments using the proper nomenclature.

Is this due to something the person who used Distance 6.0 did wrong? Or a bug?

[dill]

The "Name" column just displays the name that has been given to that model in Distance. That's free text entry to relies on the user to input something that is intelligible by someone else.

HTH

On 06/11/2015 11:57, fsdias wrote:

I'm working with a project that I can send you privately

I run this: project1<-"/path/to_folder" converted <- convert_project(project1)

and it worked as expected. Then I looked into "converted" to see what was inside:

converted
ID Name
1 3 80+10c
2 4 75+9
3 5 70+8
4 6 Defaults
5 7 72+9
6 9 Uni+poly+70
7 10 Uni+coos+72
8 11 Uni+cos+70
9 12 Hn+cos+72
10 13 Hn+cos+70
11 14 Uni+poly+72
12 15 Hr+cos+70
13 16 Hn+Hpoly+72
14 17 Hn+Hpoly+70
15 18 Hr+poly+70
16 19 Hr+cos+72
17 20 Hr+poly+72
18 21 Defaults no truncation

It's unclear what "80+10c" (line 1) means. To find out I did:

analysis_1 <- run_analysis(converted[[1]], debug=TRUE)

analysis_1

Model name: 80+10c Call: mrds::ddf(dsmodel=~cds(key="hn",formula=~1,adj.series="cos",adj.order=NULL),meta.data=list(width=101,left=0),control=list(mono=TRUE, mono.strict=TRUE),method="ds",data=obs_table)

It turns out it's a Half-normal with cos adjustments. This is weird since lines 9 and 10 report half-normal with cos adjustments using the proper nomenclature.

Is this due to something the person who used Distance 6.0 did wrong? Or a bug?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/dill/readdst/issues/12.

[fsdias]

Thanks. It would be good to add this information to the help file