search

DlangScience / scid

Scientific library for the D programming language
Boost Software License 1.0
90 stars 31 forks source link

There is probably a case for the lapack bindings to exist independently of this package #50

Open dataPulverizer opened 8 years ago

dataPulverizer commented 8 years ago

There is probably a case for the lapack bindings to exist independently of this package

John-Colvin commented 8 years ago

Could be done as a dub sub-package?

dataPulverizer commented 8 years ago

I didn't know about sub-dub, just looked at it in the manual. You guys know more about the DUB packaging system in which I am still a novice but my thinking is that lapack can exist as a library with cblas binding as a dependency that DUB can manage.

At the moment we have scid, mir, others, cblas. It may be a good idea for packages to be fragmented to allow users to piece what they want together until things solidify a bit more.

kyllingstad commented 8 years ago

I agree, it would probably be better if it were a separate package under DlangScience, like the BLAS bindings. I'm not too thrilled about the sub-package idea. Deimos is also an option.

John-Colvin commented 8 years ago

I agree, it should be a separate package entirely On 16 Jun 2016 1:37 p.m., "Lars T. Kyllingstad" notifications@github.com wrote:

I agree, it would probably be better if it were a separate package under DlangScience, like the BLAS bindings. I'm not too thrilled about the sub-package idea. Deimos https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos is also an option.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/DlangScience/scid/issues/50#issuecomment-226472457, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABx9tdm4jCgE5NQIL7jIFr87GHyrkblpks5qMUN4gaJpZM4I2sdo .