Closed pthom closed 2 years ago
Yeah, looks good, since
fplus_fwd_define_fn_1(for_each)
fplus_fwd_define_fn_1(parallel_for_each)
fplus_fwd_define_fn_2(parallel_for_each_n_threads)
fplus_fwd_define_fn_1(for_each)
fplus_fwd_define_fn_1(parallel_for_each)
fplus_fwd_define_fn_2(parallel_for_each_n_threads)
fplus_fwd_flip_define_fn_1(for_each)
fplus_fwd_flip_define_fn_1(parallel_for_each)
nicely matches:
fplus_curry_define_fn_1(transform)
fplus_curry_define_fn_1(transform_parallelly)
fplus_curry_define_fn_2(transform_parallelly_n_threads)
fplus_fwd_define_fn_1(transform)
fplus_fwd_define_fn_1(transform_parallelly)
fplus_fwd_define_fn_2(transform_parallelly_n_threads)
fplus_fwd_flip_define_fn_1(transform)
fplus_fwd_flip_define_fn_1(transform_parallelly)
:slightly_smiling_face:
We now have
Is that ok?