Closed virginiaMae closed 1 year ago
Should this be configurable or just always set to a particular pattern? Maybe make the default be whatever you get in Pretext.
We should keep track of "level" in DoenetML (like we do for nested sections) so that an empty <ref>
to a <li>
could display the correctly formatted number/letter. (It currently displays ???, so we should fix that or make a separate issue if we fix the numbering scheme but not the ???.)
I think we should start by matching the PreTeXt schema as a default, and add in configurable features in the future. If I'm reading this correctly, the second issue is for empty list items. I agree that it should display the number and/or letter, but not the ???. It feels like it should be acceptable to have an empty list item that retains the default list formatting.
My previous comment was broken because I forgot to escape the word <ref>
, which means it didn't display. I was referring to how an empty <ref>
to an <li>
displays as a ???. An empty <li>
should work fine.
Similar to standard document outlining conventions: