I don't know exactly how the image is compressed under the hood, but it makes sense if the same file, compressed two times using the same options, generates the same md5sum?
I notice that even using the same options, the md5sums are not the same. Is this a specific characteristic of this compress implementation or its something normal under all the compress processes available, since they probably change some underling bytes, etc.
For jpg files, the checksums are the same for multiple compressions.
For png files, the compression algorithm involves randomness, so it is normal to have different checksums.
I don't know exactly how the image is compressed under the hood, but it makes sense if the same file, compressed two times using the same options, generates the same md5sum?
I notice that even using the same options, the md5sums are not the same. Is this a specific characteristic of this compress implementation or its something normal under all the compress processes available, since they probably change some underling bytes, etc.