this example will create secret backend/doppler on AWS side.
We would like to have full control over how the secret's name will be on AWS Secrets Manager, as we have naming convention for all (when is possible) AWS resources at our company.
It will be great if we could achieve full compatibility when we get secrets via Doppler.
Currently when we use resource
doppler_secrets_sync_aws_secrets_manager
it will always add/doppler
suffix in the end of the name.For example:
this example will create secret
backend/doppler
on AWS side.We would like to have full control over how the secret's name will be on AWS Secrets Manager, as we have naming convention for all (when is possible) AWS resources at our company. It will be great if we could achieve full compatibility when we get secrets via Doppler.