For the second feature set proposal I'd like to try a different approach. In the previous proposal (#33) I've laid out a set of features based on previous discussions, then we started modifying features and reducing scope based on the feedback. So the proposal built up too much, then we tore away what we couldn't agree on yet. It worked out fine, but I'd like to see how it would go the other way.
This proposal starts out empty, and we should collect issues related to the features we'd like to see in the 0.2 proposal. When we see that we've reached a decent amount of work, we'll make it into a proposal and refine from there.
IMPORTANT: The idea of building up the proposal from nothing has been scrapped, the actual 0.2 proposal can be found here
For the second feature set proposal I'd like to try a different approach. In the previous proposal (#33) I've laid out a set of features based on previous discussions, then we started modifying features and reducing scope based on the feedback. So the proposal built up too much, then we tore away what we couldn't agree on yet. It worked out fine, but I'd like to see how it would go the other way.
This proposal starts out empty, and we should collect issues related to the features we'd like to see in the 0.2 proposal. When we see that we've reached a decent amount of work, we'll make it into a proposal and refine from there.
Pre-Proposed so far for 0.2