This merge request is a proposed resolution to the above issue, in lieu of DW#67's attempt to actually build LuaJIT ourselves.
I think handling this as a Lua problem is cleaner, and puts us that much closer in line with OpenMW's behavior. The discussion is still open, but I don't believe there is a better way to go here unless OpenMW indicates they are willing to retroactively enable the 52 extensions for us in LuaJIT builds they provide.
Tracking DW#19
This merge request is a proposed resolution to the above issue, in lieu of DW#67's attempt to actually build LuaJIT ourselves.
I think handling this as a Lua problem is cleaner, and puts us that much closer in line with OpenMW's behavior. The discussion is still open, but I don't believe there is a better way to go here unless OpenMW indicates they are willing to retroactively enable the 52 extensions for us in LuaJIT builds they provide.