This is the repository for my old, unsupported App Launcher for Microsoft Office 2010. (32-bit Edition.) Go here for the new version: https://github.com/DrewNaylor/UXL-Launcher
Other
1
stars
0
forks
source link
Possible new name for version 3.0: Unified eXecutable Launcher (UXL)? #6
I'm thinking about calling versions 3.0 and above "Unified App Launcher," mainly because I'm planning to combine both the 32- and the 64-bit editions into one app. But that's not the only reason for a name change! I'm also planning on dropping my my "Drew's Modification Exception" completely in the future so that the app launcher can become a fully GPL'd program - completely free software! Even though my Exception was made to play nicely with the GPLv3, I just don't want to have to deal with an extra license (even though the main license IS the GPLv3, I don't want to have the Exception tagging along forever because I want my software to be able to be accepted by the GPL fully.) So, what do you think? I'm putting this in a GitHub issue because it'll be prominent.
I'm thinking about calling versions 3.0 and above "Unified App Launcher," mainly because I'm planning to combine both the 32- and the 64-bit editions into one app. But that's not the only reason for a name change! I'm also planning on dropping my my "Drew's Modification Exception" completely in the future so that the app launcher can become a fully GPL'd program - completely free software! Even though my Exception was made to play nicely with the GPLv3, I just don't want to have to deal with an extra license (even though the main license IS the GPLv3, I don't want to have the Exception tagging along forever because I want my software to be able to be accepted by the GPL fully.) So, what do you think? I'm putting this in a GitHub issue because it'll be prominent.