Open ghost opened 10 years ago
Regarding 1: --force
sounds like a good option to have assuming that it updates/overwrites a gem version. I don't like the idea of adding a gem that's already been declared but if it simply updates the version, that seems fine.
2: The regex route was taken for the sake of getting something up and running quickly. I haven't explored the option of using Bundler's API but I would like to hear more about the benefits and how an implementation might look. I checked out your fork but I didn't see any commits on top of mine. Maybe they haven't been pushed yet.
3: Implementing groups was something that we (other contributors and I) were exploring and would definitely like to add.
Thanks for the suggestions. I spend most of my time in Node these days but I would be happy to review any pull requests for the features that you have suggested.
Regarding 1
, I would also note that if you run gemrat
on a gem that already exists, it will prompt the user to update the version. The proposed --force
option would skip this step.
Sorry I hadn't pushed my branch yet. There's still artifacts of the grep approach but using the Bundler API seems to be working.
https://github.com/Eleo/gemrat/tree/features/dick_tracy
I have no idea why I named the branch that.
Thanks. Gave it a once over, going to need some more time to review things.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Elliott Mason notifications@github.comwrote:
Sorry I hadn't pushed my branch yet. There's still artifacts of the grep approach but using the Bundler API seems to be working.
https://github.com/Eleo/gemrat/tree/features/dick_tracy
I have no idea why I named the branch that.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/DruRly/gemrat/issues/18#issuecomment-23567985 .
Dru Riley Website: http://www.drurly.com/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/DruRly LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/drurly
can't wait to see groups option implemented
Would love the groups option to be added.
Doesn't look like it, but is the groups option a thing yet?
gemrat guard --group development
. I would really like for this to be able to throw the gem in agroup :development do
block as opposed togem 'guard', group: :development
, although I'm not sure how easy this would be.Thoughts?