Aryan Shah Individual ticket

[Aryanboxout]

Highlights

Total score averaged 17/20

• [x] Runtime Links
  • Frontend
  • Backend
• [x] Technical Accomplishments - See blog/guides for review link
• [x] Blog, Guides for review
• [x] Meeting full stack and backend objectives
• [x] GitHub analytics
  • Personal
  • Frontend
  • Backend

Team Review Ticket

Scores Table

Items	Self	Somaditya	Armaan	Average
N@TM	5	5	5	5
Project quality, running cross domain and no crashes on FE to BE with these reviews	1	1	1	1
UI contains inputs that are validated for garbage, data cleaned (ie validate DOB or Password)	1	1	1	1
UI contains actions for Create, Read	1	1	1	1
UI contains actions for Update, Delete	1	1	1	1
JWT is guarding a feature, demonstration of cookies	0	0	0	0
Project quality, observation of comments in every function, class, or method reviewed. Be sure to review POJO, API	0	0	0	0
BE contains and API that shows that it handles error conditions (ie duplicate user id)	1	1	1	1
BE contains support for GET and POST methods	0	0	0	0
BE contains a database that supports Create, Read	1	1	1	1
BE contains a database that supports Update, Delete	1	1	1	1
Team review ticket	3	3	3	3
Individual review ticket	2	2	3	3

Duplicate id and UI input for login

CRUD in BE

UI contains input

CRUD in UI

[somaditya1]

Scored a solid 17/20 with the use of binary grading. Work is present, structured and organized

[xXAASXx]

Total Score when Peer Reviewing: 17/20

Scored a solid 17/20 with the use of the 1 and 0 grading (Binary Grading) as everything looked swell and the ticked is nice and organized for everything that Mr. Mortensen is looking for.

[Aryanboxout]

Armaan Peer review- Total score: 19/20 Organized work with all necessary components except BE handling duplicate ID. However, overall project quality was well done and the concept was brilliant. The ticket was well organized and easy for the grader