Closed tih2010 closed 1 year ago
Hi!
We are evaluating Dapper.FSharp. First thing we tried is to replace our registration-bag for OptionsTypes. You may have seen something like this before :-)
let register() = SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<Guid>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<byte>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<byte[]>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<int16>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<int>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<int64>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<float>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<decimal>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<float32>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<string>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<char>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<DateTime>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<DateTimeOffset>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<bool>()) SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<TimeSpan>())
We found that it works for most type, but not for the byte[] array type. So we cut it down to
let register() = Dapper.FSharp.OptionTypes.register() SqlMapper.AddTypeHandler (OptionHandler<byte[]>())
Do you think, Dapper.FSharp could cover those as well?
Best regards, Wolfram
Hi @tih2010,
sure, just send a PR and I'll deploy a new version. ;)
Hi!
We are evaluating Dapper.FSharp. First thing we tried is to replace our registration-bag for OptionsTypes. You may have seen something like this before :-)
We found that it works for most type, but not for the byte[] array type. So we cut it down to
Do you think, Dapper.FSharp could cover those as well?
Best regards, Wolfram