Closed bishtgautam closed 8 years ago
@bishtgautam, I believe now the bug is fixed through the introduction of a subroutine hr_summary_for_ch4 to calculate somhr and lithr in CNCarbonfluxType.F90 for ch4 production in the ch4mod.F90. a 10 months run indicate methane production flux is no longer zero. The branch is jinyuntang/lnd/ch4_zero_bugfix. This bug fix will not be bfb for simulations with active ch4 cycle.
@jinyuntang : Can you issue a PR?
sure
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Gautam Bisht notifications@github.com wrote:
@jinyuntang https://github.com/jinyuntang : Can you issue a PR?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ACME-Climate/ACME/issues/720#issuecomment-187416472.
Jinyun
Jinyun Tang, Research Scientist Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Rd., MS 74R316C Berkeley, CA 94720 tel: 510 486-5792, fax: 510 486-7070
The refactor of call sequence in clm4_5_13 resulted in CH4PROD = 0.
Recap of the changes made to the subroutines in clm4_5_13
clm4_5_12 call seq.
clm4_5_13 call seq.
CSEG identified this bug as bug-2225 and bug-2287 and fixed it in clm4_5_8_r168