Closed beharrop closed 11 months ago
@beharrop, my recommendation would be not to try to do anything with E3SM itself using E3SM-Unified. E3SM-Unified is meant for pre- and post-processing of E3SM output, not for interacting with CIME. I suggest using the simpler system python environment you get on Perlmutter by doing module load python
.
I believe the specific issue is that the version of perl
in E3SM-Unified is not compatible with CIME, but that's just a hunch.
Also, for my own best practice cheat sheet, should we not have the unified environment loaded to setup or build the model?
Yes, that's exactly right.
Just for fun, I checked if I could run this with e3sm_unified v1.8.1, and everything passes again. Was this an expected change going from v1.8.1 to v1.9.0?
Not exactly an expected change but it doesn't seem surprising that there would be differences -- a lot of packages are involved in E3SM-Unified (~1000) and a lot of them change between versions. It seems like perl
might have been one of them.
Thanks @xylar . I'll go ahead and just stick with the default python module moving forward.
If I have the latest e3sm_unified environment loaded on perlmutter, I get failures running
create_test
that I don't get when I do not have that environment loaded. Is this expected from how e3sm_unified was put together?I am using
2236937c71ab0c4ef67c2574e58e01a0e46714d8
hash for the E3SM code and am running./create_test SMS_Ln5.ne4pg2_oQU480.F2010
from cime/scripts/If I have not loaded e3sm_unified, everything passes. If I load e3sm_unified v1.9.0, I get the following
Just for fun, I checked if I could run this with e3sm_unified v1.8.1, and everything passes again. Was this an expected change going from v1.8.1 to v1.9.0?
Also, for my own best practice cheat sheet, should we not have the unified environment loaded to setup or build the model?