Closed hsiangheleellnl closed 1 year ago
@hsiangheleellnl , since you modified the chemistry mechanism file (named the two reactions), that file should be included in this PR.
@hsiangheleellnl , the PR should be good to go after replacing the hard-coded avogadro number with that defined in mo_constants as I suggested above.
@hsiangheleellnl , @tangq , Does this PR cause all simulations results to differ? After #32, #55, #56, the tests are NBFB. #55 with ZMmicro on is BFB. #56 with time step change, I didn't expect to affect ne30pg2 tests.
@wlin7 , #56 should be BFB. I am not sure about #32.
@hsiangheleellnl , is #32 BFB? Or it changes results?
Since O3 production and loss terms are changed due to the new chemistry mechanism file, the chem diagnostics need to modify as well.
Where nonconvergent in the implicit solver for O3 production and loss after new SOA reactions, the O3 production and loss are forced to zero. [NBFB]