search

EBISPOT / DUO

Ontology for consent codes and data use requirements
Other
64 stars 15 forks source link

DUO:0000001 - DUO:0000003 do not have a shorthand #34

Closed jimmyhli closed 4 years ago

jimmyhli commented 5 years ago

I guess the shorthand is optional, so this could be optional, since ID is the only unique identifier here.

These 3 being the only codes that don't have a shorthand, i suppose we could do something like

DUO code             name                                proposed shorthand
DUO:0000001          consent code                        CC
DUO:0000002          consent code primary category       CCP (or CC1)
DUO:0000003          consent code secondary category     CCS (or CC2)

Of course, this doesn't really change anything fundamental haha..

Plus i can sort of guess why theres no shorthand for these 3 as they seem to be the general 'parent' terms that encapsulate all others

mcourtot commented 4 years ago

Fair point. Note that we have agreed to deprecate those terms, so won't be adding any shorthand.