search

EBISPOT / DUO

Ontology for consent codes and data use requirements
Other
64 stars 15 forks source link

DUO:000015 (“No general methods research”) #47

Closed GiselleMarie closed 3 years ago

GiselleMarie commented 4 years ago

The definition and the title of the DUO conflict with each other. DUO:000015 (“No general methods research”) - description = use includes methods development research"

This was highlighted by Sanger who would like to use the ontology but can't whilst there is a mismatch between title and description. Suggest a change of Title to "general methods research"

solideoglori commented 4 years ago

The NIH/US use case benefits from an NMDS term, as datasets are often viewed as eligible for methods research even without such annotation - meaning the prohibition is the more significant term. As per conversations with Melanie, shall we maintain this one, and then create an MDS term as well?

GiselleMarie commented 4 years ago

Actually - suggest a change to the description and not the title. Change description to "use does not allow methods development research"

lymanrodriguez commented 4 years ago

I concur with that suggestion as well, though suggesting being explicit that it is with reference to methods work outside of the acceptable use parameters (e.g., for a cancer DS dataset methods work in cancer research would be fine). That might be understood from language in the broader description that is not excerpted here, so please disregard if not relevant.

mcourtot commented 4 years ago

Agree on changing the definition. If there is a need for an (N)MDS term we'll create a new ticket

mcourtot commented 4 years ago

@GiselleMarie do you still want the description to be changed? Just checking as you closed the ticket.

GiselleMarie commented 4 years ago

@mcourtot sorry my bad. Don't know why I closed - yes description should be changed.

cyamasak commented 3 years ago

I also wondered if title and description have conflict. The description says "includes methods development research", which sounds like to include "methods development = general methods research", where the title says "no general methods research". I agree to change the definition to "excludes methods development research". No need for MDS for us.

GiselleMarie commented 3 years ago

I think we are all in agreement then. Title = No general methods research Description = use DOES NOT allow methods development research

solideoglori commented 3 years ago

No change to term name. Shorthand updated to: "NMDS" Definition updated to: "This data use limitation indicates that use does not allow methods development research (e.g. development of software or algorithms)"