search

EBISPOT / DUO

Ontology for consent codes and data use requirements
Other
64 stars 15 forks source link

Reference to DOID_4 #5

Open rushtong opened 7 years ago

rushtong commented 7 years ago

@mcourtot I don't have any clear evidence of a problem here, but I am concerned about replicating the exact owl class of http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/DOID_4. There are some differences between the DUO version of that class and the DOID version in http://www.obofoundry.org/ontology/doid.html

Is there a need to duplicate (and potentially override some values of) that DOID term? I can envision potential issues when a system needs to use both ontologies and there now exist two classes with the same ID. Which one takes precedence?

mcourtot commented 7 years ago

Hi @rushtong - very valid point. We actually should use only the URI of the DO class and import the metadata at release time. This is my mistake and I'll fix the Makefile. This may take a little while as I'm on leave atm.

For the details if interested we are using the MIREOT guideline which is implemented by our release tool ROBOT