For example, a search on 'has part' returns a BFO hit, but the "Ontology:" field tends to list some ontology that isn't BFO. I think it is safe to say prefix of term should force selection of matching ontology? Example:
has part BFO:0000051
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000051
Ontology: Genomic Epidemiology Ontology GENEPIO
Also in: MFMOOMIABISOVAEGEOCEPHOHDAEROBCOOGGIDOPCOOBCSFLUAGROINOSDGIOSTATOROPPOMSIODIDEOMPIOFBbiECOCOREOGSFENVOICOOOSTTMCOMICROCLOCAROBCGOAFOOMITPOHTNIAOOAEGENOOBIBOPLUPABSPOZECOSEPIOZPLABOFLOPOAPOLLO_SVNBOICEOOHMIPDRODUODRONHPMPPLANAWBLSWBbtOBIFBdvFBbtFBcvFBcvCROMROEUPATHOPMIVOGOCLECOOHPIXPOWBPhenotypeEFOPATOPHIPOCHEBIFOODONOMRSEPLANPUBERONONTONEOCHEMINF
Also, if we could get 'Also in' list to be sorted, that would be sweet.
For example, a search on 'has part' returns a BFO hit, but the "Ontology:" field tends to list some ontology that isn't BFO. I think it is safe to say prefix of term should force selection of matching ontology? Example:
has part BFO:0000051 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000051 Ontology: Genomic Epidemiology Ontology GENEPIO Also in: MFMOOMIABISOVAEGEOCEPHOHDAEROBCOOGGIDOPCOOBCSFLUAGROINOSDGIOSTATOROPPOMSIODIDEOMPIOFBbiECOCOREOGSFENVOICOOOSTTMCOMICROCLOCAROBCGOAFOOMITPOHTNIAOOAEGENOOBIBOPLUPABSPOZECOSEPIOZPLABOFLOPOAPOLLO_SVNBOICEOOHMIPDRODUODRONHPMPPLANAWBLSWBbtOBIFBdvFBbtFBcvFBcvCROMROEUPATHOPMIVOGOCLECOOHPIXPOWBPhenotypeEFOPATOPHIPOCHEBIFOODONOMRSEPLANPUBERONONTONEOCHEMINF
Also, if we could get 'Also in' list to be sorted, that would be sweet.
Thanks for consideration,
Damion