Add ontologies for TMTpro 16-plex reagents for labelled proteomics

[IgnatiusPang]

Currently, for proteomics labelled quantification analysis, the ontology does not include reagent for TMTpro 16-plex labelling. They are TMT133N TMT133C TMT134N

The errors that I've received in the px_submission.log file while submitting data files on Proteome Exchange is s follows: 2022-07-21 23:58:48,971 INFO [pool-1-thread-2] u.a.e.p.s.v.Main [Main.java:111] ERROR : Value is not match with ontology', value='tmt134n', row=16, column='comment[label]' 2022-07-21 23:58:48,971 INFO [pool-1-thread-2] u.a.e.p.s.v.Main [Main.java:111] ERROR : Value is not match with ontology', value='tmt133c', row=15, column='comment[label]' 2022-07-21 23:58:48,971 INFO [pool-1-thread-2] u.a.e.p.s.v.Main [Main.java:111] ERROR : Value is not match with ontology', value='tmt133n', row=14, column='comment[label]' 2022-07-21 23:58:48,971 ERROR [pool-1-thread-2] u.a.e.p.g.t.FileScanAndValidationTask [FileScanAndValidationTask.java:313] Error in file sdrf-tmt.tsv

Would you please add the above ontologies please? I could not use these labels in the SDRF file for submission into PRIDE database.

The other TMT reagents are currently available as accepted ontologies: TMT126 TMT127N TMT127C TMT128N TMT128C TMT129N TMT129C TMT130N TMT130C TMT131N TMT131C TMT132N TMT132C

[serjoshua]

Hello @IgnatiusPang,

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I just checked PRIDE ontology and apparently TMT133N, TMT133C and TMT134N don't exist or hasn't been added to their OWL/OBO configuration. OLS has no control over this and I suggest to raise the issue to the maintainers themselves of the ontology. Thank you and regards.

Josh