Open zoependlington opened 5 years ago
@zoependlington Wrt the skin term, my understanding, from prior knowledge and from a quick look at the Wikipedia entries for nevus and mole, is that 'mole' is a colloquial synonym for 'melanocytic nevus' (sure, the most common type of nevi), that the EFO term is the correct broad parent for all types of nevi including moles, and that the UBERON term may need revising. We should move mole-containing synonyms of EFO 'nevus' to EFO 'melanocytic nevus'. We could double-check this using a non-Wikipedia and non-UBERON reference. In fact, MONDO has 'mole' and 'mole of skin' as exact synonyms of 'melanocytic nevus'. Mondo doesn't have 'nevus'; their 'melanocytic nevus' is a subclass of melanocytic skin neoplasm benign neoplasm of skin
Following up on this. Skin moles derive from "irregular" growth of cells, and as such, even when benign, I wouldn't consider them in scope for an anatomy ontology, but rather for a phenotype or disease one. So, I would keep UBERON_1000010 (mole) in the "exclude" list for EFO, as it is now. Suggestions on fixing mole- and nevi-related synonyms follow. "Mole" is used to refer to both 'nevus' and 'melanocytic nevus'. So, to be conservative, I'd suggest to link "mole" to the broader term 'nevus':
During the last release, one big issue was the duplicate of "mole", two terms with the same label but completely different definitions:
Currently the UBERON term is on the exclude list and is not in EFO. However, it is worth looking into as to whether we need the anatomy term in EFO.
We do currently have a disease term for: