Open matentzn opened 4 years ago
These look like duplicates to me. I will obsolete the EFO term with the HP terms as replacements.
Note to self: one is a GWAS term and the other is part of the UKBB mappings - need to rectify this and ensure that the HP term also has these annotations.
Is there a reason for why there are any equivalent classes between names at all in efo? For example, I am wondering whether the following is really necessary or whether this does not suggest that the EFO term should be simply obsoleted and replaced by the HP term.