Closed stuchalk closed 1 week ago
Thanks for reporting @stuchalk! This doesn't look right and we'll look into it.
Thanks!
This has been fixed in production now!
Thank you!
They still look wrong to me?
"short_form" : "CAO_CAO_000001",
"obo_id" : "CAO_CAO:000001",
Possibly related: https://github.com/EBISPOT/ols4/issues/721 ?
You are correct they are still wrong, and quite likely related to #721...
Probably its a deployment issue let me check! it shows correct format on wwwdev
https://wwwdev.ebi.ac.uk/ols4/api/ontologies/cao/terms?lang=en
The production system didn't have the latest config which resulted in this... in the next release cycle which will be tomorrow probably this will be fixed. I will keep an eye on it.
I can see this fixed in production now! closing this.
Describe the bug The CAO ontology terms in OLS have incorrectly formatted short_form codes throughout.
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior Go to the ontology at https://champ.stuchalk.domains.unf.edu/images/ontology/cao.owl and verify the term id format, 'CAO_\d{6}' in regex.