More than one of same ancestry group in discovery:
GCST000843
GCST003123
GCST003124
GCST003125
GCST003976
GCST003977
GCST003978
GCST005161
GCST006144
GCST006435
GCST007357
GCST007407
GCST007408
GCST007409
GCST009158
GCST010069
GCST010070
GCST010090
GCST010302
GCST011977
GCST012977
GCST90000032
GCST90085697
GCST003761
GCST006246
GCST006391
GCST006392
GCST006393
GCST006857
GCST006858
GCST007998
GCST008966
GCST011588
GCST006170
GCST012716
GCST009514
GCST009515
I have not looked into these in any detail. We should consider adding validation for these in future, since there is no scenario where there should be more than one of the same ancestry category.
While doing some ancestry analysis I found errors in the following studies:
No discovery sample description: GCST90093220 GCST90093223 GCST90093226 GCST90093229 GCST90093232 GCST90093235 GCST90093238 GCST90093217 GCST90102942
More than one of same ancestry group in discovery: GCST000843 GCST003123 GCST003124 GCST003125 GCST003976 GCST003977 GCST003978 GCST005161 GCST006144 GCST006435 GCST007357 GCST007407 GCST007408 GCST007409 GCST009158 GCST010069 GCST010070 GCST010090 GCST010302 GCST011977 GCST012977 GCST90000032 GCST90085697 GCST003761 GCST006246 GCST006391 GCST006392 GCST006393 GCST006857 GCST006858 GCST007998 GCST008966 GCST011588 GCST006170 GCST012716 GCST009514 GCST009515
I have not looked into these in any detail. We should consider adding validation for these in future, since there is no scenario where there should be more than one of the same ancestry category.