Closed ayasuda2OO3 closed 4 years ago
1) In the prod release (v1.212) the refId used in the superconn which is the process#, hence no duplicate issue. 2) as for superconns, the process# is invisible in the health endpoint in the current prod release. 3) the refId assignment of the server inst is the intance# in the coming watcher release. watcher is designed as the replacement for the server agent for container scaling.
Close the issue for the clarity. @palokam
Use Case
Current key-value format for the agent superconn establishment as follows-
agentId+refId+groupId
It's very possible a superconn be replaced by one another from a different server Agent, which may revoke the server-agent HA, and cause the instability in the connectivity.
Proposal
1) Find the root cause of the duplicate or co-existed superconns in the current behaviour. (v1.1,212) 2) differentiate the superconns across different VMs. 3) Make server HA, as is in the CF environement.