ECMWFCode4Earth / challenges_2020

ECMWF Summer of Weather Code 2020 challenges
49 stars 9 forks source link

Challenge #23 -What is an optimal number of vertical model levels to represent atmospheric trace gases #7

Closed EsperanzaCuartero closed 3 years ago

EsperanzaCuartero commented 4 years ago

Challenge #23 - What is an optimal number of vertical model levels to represent atmospheric trace gases?

Stream 2 - Machine-Learning and Artificial Intelligence

Goal

Finding an optimal vertical resolution that requires a minimum number of vertical levels to represent the vertical structure of atmospheric traces gases (ozone, NO2, CO2, and aerosols), which are simulated by the ECMWF model on 137 model levels. Different scenarios should be represented for reduction of the model levels in the range between 70 to 10 model levels.

Mentors and skills

Challenge description

Data

CAMS operational forecast data for ozone, NO2, aerosols and CO2 at the original 137 model levels.

What is the current problem/limitation?

The IFS uses 137 levels in the atmosphere to simulate the weather as well as transport and the sources and sinks of atmospheric trace gases. The traces gases tend to have pronounced vertical gradients predominately close to the surface and for ozone and NO2 also in the stratosphere. Far fewer than the 137 model level may be sufficient to represent the vertical variability of the trace gases.

What could be the solution?

Further directions

Apply the method to also reduce the horizontal resolution in areas with little gradients such as over the ocean or int the stratosphere.

JiaweiZhuang commented 4 years ago

That's an interesting problem! My paper on ACP is quite relevant: The importance of vertical resolution in the free troposphere for modeling intercontinental plumes

JohannesFlemming commented 4 years ago

Hi Jiawei,

thank you for your input. The optimal resolution for the model is indeed an interesting science questions. Your and Sebastien Eastham's papers point out the importance of the a high vertical resolution for long-range plume transport. (It would be interesting to see if your findings are also valid for the semi-Lagrangian advection scheme of the IFS.)

The core of the esowc is to find a cost effective resolution for the archiving of the data. The model IFS will continue to run the 137 vertical level configuration. NWP data are mostly stored on about 20 pressure levels. I want the project to find a good compromise between the NWP approach and archiving the full 137 levels all the time (which actually takes much longer than running the model).

Giving your research background, would you be interested to propose a solution ?

kind regards, Johannes


From: Jiawei Zhuang notifications@github.com Sent: 16 February 2020 05:35 To: esowc/challenges_2020 challenges_2020@noreply.github.com Cc: Johannes Flemming Johannes.Flemming@ecmwf.int; Assign assign@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [esowc/challenges_2020] Challenge #23 -What is an optimal number of vertical model levels to represent atmospheric trace gases (#7)

My paper on ACP is quite relevant: The importance of vertical resolution in the free troposphere for modeling intercontinental plumeshttps://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.atmos-chem-phys.net%2F18%2F6039%2F2018%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjohannes.flemming%40ecmwf.int%7Cce635c504d814270638908d7b2a21418%7C21b711c6aab74d369ffbac0357bc20ba%7C0%7C1%7C637174281496622515&sdata=hca%2FHdMVhEcE4rcnLL2e12cVuBIISR9kpqzCj5OJYh0%3D&reserved=0

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fesowc%2Fchallenges_2020%2Fissues%2F7%3Femail_source%3Dnotifications%26email_token%3DAOLP6MMT7PQSHFQZ2MYISSTRDDGDHA5CNFSM4KIG3T22YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEL36LIQ%23issuecomment-586671522&data=02%7C01%7Cjohannes.flemming%40ecmwf.int%7Cce635c504d814270638908d7b2a21418%7C21b711c6aab74d369ffbac0357bc20ba%7C0%7C1%7C637174281496622515&sdata=KbdWfpdd%2FBrc9spXK63DLO%2BcxVRlIwRXmfybRahSDlw%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAOLP6MMJI3YT7XZLW776NSTRDDGDHANCNFSM4KIG3T2Q&data=02%7C01%7Cjohannes.flemming%40ecmwf.int%7Cce635c504d814270638908d7b2a21418%7C21b711c6aab74d369ffbac0357bc20ba%7C0%7C1%7C637174281496632507&sdata=orM5vF8nwYBdLXmOdM9NNM3FmCXS6AL2rk%2FVgM%2BywVU%3D&reserved=0.

jwagemann commented 4 years ago

Join us for our LIVE @ecmwf Summer of Weather Code Ask Me Anything session on 1 April 2020 at 2 pm (CET) (tomorrow).

Get infos first hand from the #ESoWC2020 organisers, mentors and former #ESoWC participants. ➡️Sign up

jwagemann commented 4 years ago

Only 4 days left to apply to be part of ECMWF Summer of Weather Code 2020. Application deadline: Wednesday, 22 April 2020 at 23:59 (BST). Submit your proposal here.