Closed amehta-scottlogic closed 2 weeks ago
air-quality-ui
St.:grey_question: |
Category | Percentage | Covered / Total |
---|---|---|---|
π’ | Statements | 97.41% (-2.59% π») |
113/116 |
π’ | Branches | 92.86% (-7.14% π») |
26/28 |
π’ | Functions | 89.29% (-10.71% π») |
25/28 |
π’ | Lines | 97.17% (-2.83% π») |
103/106 |
Report generated by π§ͺjest coverage report action from 442a73c6fda65bd43a304286ec56af2b7284d3f4
current status: β
Overall Coverage
Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status 690 648 94% 80% π’ New Files
No new covered files...
Modified Files
File Coverage Status air-quality-backend/src/air_quality/api/forecast_controller.py 100% π’ air-quality-backend/src/air_quality/api/main.py 100% π’ air-quality-backend/src/air_quality/database/in_situ.py 97% π’ air-quality-backend/src/air_quality/etl/forecast/forecast_dao.py 100% π’ air-quality-backend/src/air_quality/etl/in_situ/openaq_adapter.py 98% π’ air-quality-backend/src/air_quality/etl/in_situ/openaq_orchestrator.py 100% π’ TOTAL 99% π’ updated for commit:
442a73c
by actionπ
Changes
This PR adds a summary table showing a comparison between forecast and in situ pollutants for the closest base and valid times
Some back end changes were required. Where these are anything other than linting I've left comments explaining
https://github.com/ECMWFCode4Earth/vAirify/assets/110030119/c15beaaa-e39b-4635-b598-f2f2189880da