Closed af-ayala closed 3 years ago
Merging #286 (0111752) into master (a40816b) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #286 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage 93.3% 93.3%
======================================
Files 36 36
Lines 2627 2627
======================================
Hits 2452 2452
Misses 175 175
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
clang | 93.3% <ø> (ø) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a40816b...0111752. Read the comment docs.
Sorry, @junghans I broke it again
@streeve @junghans My reasoning to build with Cabana_ENABLE_HEFFTE
and not Cabana_REQUIRE_HEFFTE
is in the details of Cabana_add_dependency()
.
If we set the REQUIRE
var to ON, then we are calling find_package(Heffte)
twice. Unfortunately Heffte v1.0 is not guarded against this, and a CMake error occurs. (My Heffte PR just a couple commits after v1.0)
Cabana_ENABLE_HEFFTE
doesn't do anything, but I understand why you removed REQUIRE
now. We'll need a minor release for that then
Cabana_ENABLE_HEFFTE
doesn't do anything, but I understand why you removedREQUIRE
now. We'll need a minor release for that then
Ah, right. I'm not sure there is an ideal solution at the moment. We could, for now, have travis just clone and build with the most recent heFFTe commit (not glued to v1.0 tag). Our build will start breaking when a new heFFTe version releases, but at that point we can redirect travis to build that new tagged version (v1.0.1, or whatever)?
(edit) nevermind - it looks like there was no real need for Cabana_add_dependency()
to call find_package()
two times. I rearranged it into an if-else and we should be able to avoid this issue, and then build heFFTe v1.0 just fine. :thumbsup:
This should be ready for another review
You guys will need to do a rebase to resolve conflicts - they are likely from recent updates to the code formatting style.
Retest this please
I rebased to clean up the commit history.
Also just a note that the interpolation test failed again (2 ranks)
@junghans any idea why codecov is messed up?
Try to merge with master first.
Retest this please
This is ready for review (HIP failure is unrelated - not yet using HIP with FFT)
retest this please
Retest this please
This is ready for (hopefully final) review
Integration of heFFTe v 1.0.1 into Cabana ECP. The current API (fully based on C++11) shall remain for future developments.