Closed spadino closed 7 years ago
We are not addressing this at this time. We have enough on our plate at the moment. Closing as it's not a bug
I will probably do this later in the future. looks like a easy thing to add sometime later
Not sure it is worth the time to implement something not relying on an API.
We will see. Might do it and will keep this until decided.
2017-03-07 8:56 GMT+01:00 AnthorNet notifications@github.com:
Not sure it is worth the time to implement something not relying on an API.
— You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/EDDiscovery/EDDiscovery/issues/874#issuecomment-284648452, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJRXLFbn2qMNGxR_tYYwKko7pc7BSJOfks5rjQ2xgaJpZM4MQ84p .
Inara is working on a API. We will wait for it before doing any work.
Still no API. No indication of timing. Closing and will reopen if it ever appears
Looks like there's an API now? https://inara.cz/inara-api/
Docs: https://inara.cz/inara-api-docs/
It looks like INARA only uses data available in the journal - e.g. no ship modules or module engineering.
Just knew that it was released a tool that allow for integration with INARA from the log files. Maybe, the coders could be interested in integrate it with EDDiscovery... https://github.com/jtickle/Picard