Open mobb opened 6 years ago
e.g., things to consider from table 2:
Scope terms (taxonomic, temporal, spatial): we have some of these in the summary table already. (some are EML <coverage>
metadata). ecocom's summary table could be extended with more HC values, gleaned from data values.
general terms (method, completeness) might be best as keyword metadata (confirm) or dataset-level annotations (EML 2.2)
dataset general: mostly maps directly to EML (confirm, see their appendix) taxonomic id terms are in the taxon table (confirm)
@mobb do you still want to pursue this?
You may be interested and are welcome in the TDWG Task Group actively working on defining a Humboldt Extension to Darwin Core.
citation: Robert Guralnick , Ramona Walls and Walter Jetz 2017 Humboldt Core –toward a standardized capture of biological inventories for biodiversity monitoring, modeling and assessment Ecography 40: 001–012, doi: 10.1111/ecog.02942