EFeru / hoverboard-firmware-hack-FOC

With Field Oriented Control (FOC)
GNU General Public License v3.0
1.15k stars 956 forks source link

Hoverkart support #245

Open Meltedgyro opened 2 years ago

Meltedgyro commented 2 years ago

Hello there, i am looking to make a long range hoverkart to tow my friends on a bike around.

long story short, i have a 10inch hoverboard and a hoverkart which operates by tilting the hoverboard. Since the active balancing and “normal” hoverboard use is not yet implemented i am wondering if i could use some version of the firmware in a way that the hoverboard gets strapped to the kart ( the levers are made immovable to not hinder operation under torque) and i use my rc radio (ibus compatible tx16s radio controller) together with a flysky receiver for the following:

Also will FOC give me better battery life (comparing to commutation at same speed) and higher possible speeds? Also will torque be affected by FOC?

If the above mentioned is possible i would love to know how powerfull is the integrated brake. (Can it slow me down to a stop on a 10% grade road) And i promise the last question lol, i assume this is a one way process (ie no coming back to the original FW as its locked). Does this firmware use the stock bootloader or does it have its own. Im thinking to remove the original mcu and just replacing it with a new one to try the FW

thanks for making this, it seems like a great project i cannot wait for hoverboard support to come out. (Cus when it does it is going on my daily driver board)

Best regards, Meltedgyro

EFeru commented 2 years ago

Hi,

You can check the Wiki pages for what is currently possible with the firmware: https://github.com/EFeru/hoverboard-firmware-hack-FOC/wiki

For you I think you need to look at these VARIANTS: https://github.com/EFeru/hoverboard-firmware-hack-FOC/wiki/Variant-HOVERCAR https://github.com/EFeru/hoverboard-firmware-hack-FOC/wiki/Variant-IBUS

I guess some of the questions will then be answered. Regarding FOC, the motor control is better, also in terms of energy consumption and noise. The firmware has no bootloader needs "The bootloader is stored in the internal boot ROM (system memory) of STM32 devices, and is programmed by ST during production." (taken from STM website)

Braking should be enough to stop a person. It is all about how much energy can be put back to the battery in a certain interval. If the battery is full, then less energy is going thought the batter, but the energy is there so the FETs can blow-up if you brake very aggresivelly. Personally, I did not experiment the board limits (I played the safe way... since I don't have many spare boards).

Meltedgyro commented 2 years ago

Hi, thanks for the reply, using the hovercar variant, can i controll direction with the radio controller… is it possible to brake without pedals?

EFeru commented 2 years ago

Yes, if you use RC control, then you have full control, directions, modes, etc

Jenya-m commented 2 years ago

How can you make braking more powerful than traction? The fact is that the traction is quite strong and I have to limit it, but this reduces the braking force.

Jenya-m commented 2 years ago

Now i am using:

define I_MOT_MAX 25 // [A] Maximum single motor current limit

define I_DC_MAX 27 // [A] Maximum stage2 DC Link current limit for Commutation and Sinusoidal types (This is the final current protection. Above this value, current chopping is applied. To avoid this make sure that I_DC_MAX = I_MOT_MAX + 2A)

I_DC_MAX = I_MOT_MAX + 2A -----Why is that? ----What if :

define I_MOT_MAX 19

define I_DC_MAX 27

----???

Jenya-m commented 2 years ago

Thank you, your project is the best!