Closed Jollyfant closed 6 years ago
I know, but this was implemented intentionally. I'm not completely aware of the EIDA SNCL
naming convention. However, with your suggestion this would mean
Nl == NL
Hence, in case a Nl
network is defined this would inevitably lead to errors, right?
I would think it returns a 204 if you query and end point. Nl is not equivalent to NL
There is no further standardization statement on network codes beyond the fact that it is 1 or 2 letters, alphanumeric, and parts of the name space are reserved for temporary networks (with non-unique codes). There is no statement (neither on the FDSN website nor in SEED appendix J) disallowing for non-capital network codes, or stating that capital and non-capital letters are to be treeated as equal. Also for channel codes (a bit better defined SEED manual appendix A), there is no statement which either disallows for non-capital codes or sets ABC=abc. However, as all channel codes defined in appendix A, and all networks registered at http://www.fdsn.org/networks/ are in capital letters, users assuming ABC=abc have not terribly failed yet. Thus many users may expect the equality to be given.. It would, by the way, be a creative solution for the issues with name space limitation for networks in mseed, to take the seed standard by its word and start assigning network codes including non-capital letters...
I'll implement a fix.
Try: