search

EKGF / ekg-maturity

Maturity Model for the Enterprise Knowledge Graph
https://maturity.ekgf.org
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International
13 stars 4 forks source link

Add dataset metadata #64

Closed rivettp closed 2 years ago

rivettp commented 2 years ago

From the Google doc

jgeluk commented 2 years ago

I do not see any reference to the term "Self-describing dataset" (SDD), it would be great if you could add that somewhere, maybe best to do that in the Dataset Metadata section?

There's this page now on the principles website: https://principles.ekgf.org/vocab/sdd/

If you could link to that for "more info" then we can work out all the various details of that metadata there.

rivettp commented 2 years ago

I wasn't aware of that page. That set of pages seem to be for defining the terms, it doesn't seem appropriate for that huge amount of content. And the list is rather aspirational so different aspects are best IMO associated with different levels of maturity. Do you have an example of a SDD that covers all those aspects?

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022, 4:17 AM Jacobus Geluk @.***> wrote:

I do not see any reference to the term "Self-describing dataset" (SDD), it would be great if you could add that somewhere, maybe best to do that in the Dataset Metadata section?

There's this page now on the principles website: https://principles.ekgf.org/vocab/sdd/

If you could link to that for "more info" then we can work out all the various details of that metadata there.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/EKGF/ekg-maturity/pull/64#issuecomment-1277219276, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIQPQOPXP4XACQIATFQAPLWC7AQXANCNFSM6AAAAAARDWUJFQ . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

jgeluk commented 2 years ago

It's a big page yes, many of these sub-topics will have to be moved to other pages at some point. When we get more content we'll have to.

Most of it is aspirational indeed, similar to the three top levels of the maturity model. So yes we should rank them per MM-level.

On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 19:00, Pete Rivett @.***> wrote:

I wasn't aware of that page. That set of pages seem to be for defining the terms, it doesn't seem appropriate for that huge amount of content. And the list is rather aspirational so different aspects are best IMO associated with different levels of maturity. Do you have an example of a SDD that covers all those aspects?

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022, 4:17 AM Jacobus Geluk @.***> wrote:

I do not see any reference to the term "Self-describing dataset" (SDD), it would be great if you could add that somewhere, maybe best to do that in the Dataset Metadata section?

There's this page now on the principles website: https://principles.ekgf.org/vocab/sdd/

If you could link to that for "more info" then we can work out all the various details of that metadata there.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/EKGF/ekg-maturity/pull/64#issuecomment-1277219276, or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIQPQOPXP4XACQIATFQAPLWC7AQXANCNFSM6AAAAAARDWUJFQ

. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/EKGF/ekg-maturity/pull/64#issuecomment-1279305649, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGTDVX45MCIZ427FG5HYLDWDGNR7ANCNFSM6AAAAAARDWUJFQ . You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: @.***>