search

EPFL-ENAC / eesd-mast

EESD - MAST (MAsonry Shake-Table) - A comprehensive database and collaborative resource for advancing seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings
https://mast-dev.epfl.ch/
GNU General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Deactivate for the moment the numerical models (coming soon) #59

Open mchaindl opened 4 days ago

mchaindl commented 4 days ago

@ymarcon @charlottegiseleweil At EESD we have been discussing that, for the moment (at least for the first launch of the website), it is better to keep the numerical model option deactivated, mainly because we still need to check the models more carefully, and also I have made a couple of changes on a few of them. In that sense, is that possible for the moment to keep seeing that there are numerical models available but without allowing the user to access or download them?

ymarcon commented 4 days ago

Sure, it is possible. Do you have an estimated date for the numerical models to be ready?

mchaindl commented 4 days ago

Not sure yet, but I am trying to do my best to have it as soon as possible. I would say by early August they should be ready.

ymarcon commented 4 days ago

And do you plan to communicate about the website before the numerical models are ready? Otherwise we can just wait.

mchaindl commented 4 days ago

Yes, is okay if they are not ready because this is really a nice effort we are doing in terms of sharing numerical models. This is normally not done.

ymarcon commented 4 days ago

I meant if there is no rush, we could spare the dev time spent to hide things temporarily.

mchaindl commented 3 days ago

I am not sure what do you mean, but hidding this info temporarily is okay for me. I am not sure if I am answering your question.

ymarcon commented 4 hours ago

It takes dev time to hide things, and there is just a few hours remaining for the project (and there is still substantial work to do), so if we can avoid this work by delaying the website publication until the numerical models are ready, it is better. Anyway, it is a project management issue and I'll check with @charlottegiseleweil.