search

EPSCoR / ERCore

ERcore content management system to assist with NSF EPSCoR reporting
4 stars 7 forks source link

Position Type Taxonomy? #36

Closed tschet closed 8 years ago

tschet commented 9 years ago

What does the position type taxonomy do? Is it used? I see references to it in the code. There are half a dozen MySQL queries to it, but I can't see that its used anywhere. There doesn't appear to be any active fields that reference the taxonomy.

iserna commented 9 years ago

@tschet I just reviewed our live site and we are not referencing this taxonomy term anywhere. This may be a left over from the initial development of the module.

@khuffman, @aturling, @cjallen-epscor can you all confirm if you are or not using the Position Type taxonomy term.

Thanks.

tschet commented 9 years ago

I would appreciate that, thanks.

khuffman commented 9 years ago

I do not recall to ever have used Position Type taxonomy in anything I modified for our jurisdiction, so I'm pretty sure we are not using it here in RI.

Kia

On 09/25/2015 11:17 AM, Douglas Tschetter wrote:

I would appreciate that, thanks.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/EPSCoR/ERCore-3.1/issues/36#issuecomment-143249856.

cjallen-epscor commented 9 years ago

@tschet - I can confirm that we are not using that taxonomy. I'm pretty sure it was leftover from an original proposed User Profile system that the team strayed away from.

aturling commented 9 years ago

We are also not using position type; the term list is empty.

tschet commented 9 years ago

North Dakota doesn't use it either. I did add another taxonomy so they could track both categories (components) and projects (new taxonomy) separately. Thanks for the quick replies.

cjallen-epscor commented 9 years ago

I propose we remove this taxonomy from core since we are not using it.

cjallen-epscor commented 8 years ago

This taxonomy has been removed from the 3.x branch - https://github.com/EPSCoR/ERCore-3.1/commit/5e9d67f76423eaf967b758e56577a20f3943750d