Closed xtjjyygy closed 7 months ago
Thanks. There are very occasional bugs in the MIP solver that we will fix in due course. I will see whether this one is easy to fix
Thanks. There are very occasional bugs in the MIP solver that we will fix in due course. I will see whether this one is easy to fix
Professor, I also encountered a similar problem. I guess the reason is in pathSeparator, but I am not sure how to fix it.
Fixed by #1499
Thanks. There are very occasional bugs in the MIP solver that we will fix in due course. I will see whether this one is easy to fix
Professor, I also encountered a similar problem. I guess the reason is in pathSeparator, but I am not sure how to fix it.
After #1499 is actioned, please let me know if this fixes your issue, @tusiqi1
Thanks. There are very occasional bugs in the MIP solver that we will fix in due course. I will see whether this one is easy to fix
Professor, I also encountered a similar problem. I guess the reason is in pathSeparator, but I am not sure how to fix it.
After #1499 is actioned, please let me know if this fixes your issue, @tusiqi1
My early termination is resolved after 1499 fix. Thank you, Professor
Thanks @tusiqi1
Hello, I solved the problem pk1.mps in MIPLIB2017 with Highs and found the optimal value is 15, but this problem's optimal value should be 11, as shown in the picture, I think there may be some issues with the logic of highs in proving the optimal solution, FYI.
Thanks