Open stumarcus314 opened 1 year ago
Attached is the MPS.GZ file that generates the error. p12_fix0_MILP_binary_x_for_HiGHS.mps.gz
If a MIP is infeasible there's no dual ray
Is Julia's JuMP requesting a dual ray after HiGHS solves the MIP?
I don't know. I don't see why it should.
In the case you've highlighted, HiGHS should report something more informative. I'll see that it does
We check if there is a dual ray for all infeasible problems:
We trap and handle the error, so this is not an actual problem and no error is thrown from Julia. It's just a printing issue.
Once #1359 is merged into master
, HiGHS no longer logs anything or returns an error from getDualRay
if the model is a MIP, since there will never be an invertible representation, so the ray is not well defined.
I get an error when I try to solve a feasibility problem in JuMP using HiGHS. I use Julia v1.9.1 with the Julia packages JuMP v1.12.0 and HiGHS v1.5.2.
$ julia JuMP_solve.jl Running HiGHS 1.5.3 [date: 1970-01-01, git hash: 45a127b78] Copyright (c) 2023 HiGHS under MIT licence terms Presolving model 270074 rows, 274684 cols, 1084700 nonzeros 269789 rows, 274399 cols, 1082726 nonzeros Objective function is integral with scale 1
Solving MIP model with: 269789 rows 274399 cols (274398 binary, 1 integer, 0 implied int., 0 continuous) 1082726 nonzeros
Solving report Status Infeasible Primal bound inf Dual bound inf Gap inf Solution status - Timing 44.02 (total) 1.44 (presolve) 0.00 (postsolve) Nodes 1 LP iterations 11798 (total) 0 (strong br.) 0 (separation) 0 (heuristics) ERROR: No invertible representation for getDualRay 45.992959 seconds (3.86 M allocations: 492.087 MiB, 0.48% gc time, 0.52%